‘Tis said that good things come in threes. I believe the converse is also true – bad
things also come in threes! In the face
of the overwhelming bad news coming out of Palestine/Israel this week, three stories
– for me – stood out:
Mufti Amin al-Husseini |
The first was a report that Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu has taken to blaming the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem for the
Holocaust, claiming that, starting in the 1920s, Mufti Amin al-Husseini told
Hitler to kill the Jews that he was planning to expel from Germany rather than
evicting them, because the latter course of action would send them to Palestine
(http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/10/26/netanyahus-outrageous-lie-palestinian-grand-mufti-hitler-column/74487550).
Now, let’s never mind that this
conversation never happened. Historians
and scholars far more knowledgeable than I have reported that while al-Husseini
did, in fact, talk to Hitler, it was in November of 1941, well after the
Holocaust was under way and al-Husseini’s meeting with Hitler was to ask for
support for an independent Palestinian state (remember, this was during the
British Mandate period).
While it is clear that Netanyahu’s motive for making this
ridiculous claim is to gain support for the increasingly aggressive Israeli
campaign of violence against the Palestinians, it also demonstrates the lengths
to which the right-wing Zionist government will go to rationalize what an
increasing number of people are recognizing as an Apartheid state. And that is bad news – for both the Israelis
who are hearing shades of “Holocaust denial” in their elected leadership – and for
the Palestinians – the perpetual “victims” of this conflict no matter who is
holding the weapon!
Why "punish" Abbas but not Netanyahu? |
The second story that made me angry was that the US
Government has voted to decrease aid to Palestine by 22% as a “message” to
Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas to stop the escalating violence in the West
Bank (http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/10/abbas-netanyahu-palestinian-authority.html#). I am outraged that my government – and my tax
dollars – not only to continue to fund the violence by generous gifts to the
Israeli government (which far exceed anything that goes to the Palestinians!),
but has, once again, unilaterally accept the Israeli rhetoric that blames the
Palestinians for all of the evils in the region! If the US truly wanted to bring peace to the
region – they would cut off aid to all parties concerned unless and until not
only the violence, but also the human rights violations, have ended!
Finally, and this is also related to the US’ ongoing “love
affair” with Israel – I was horrified to hear that a forum will be held in Jerusalem, providing US Presidential
candidates an hour each to “present their views on U.S. foreign policy,
US-Israel relations, threats affecting US allies in Europe and Asia, the
instability in the Middle East, terrorism, and solutions to increase the
economic well-being and security of Americans in the US and abroad.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/natasha-srdoc/firstever-us-presidential_b_8367160.html.
Should US Presidential Candidates debate here? |
First, I am categorically stating here and now that I
will not support any candidate – of either party – who participates in this
event. Israel is NOT our 51st
state, and while there well may be issues about our foreign policy that affect
Israel (as, indeed, they affect the rest of the world!), there is no earthy
reason to stage such an event abroad – much less is one of the most contentious
places on earth! As it did when Netanyahu invited himself to
speak to Congress, this is a clear case of another country attempting to
influence our foreign policy – and I would hope that all serious candidates
will distance themselves from this spectacle!